Mary Leriche
Development of Modern Art:
Post 3
Post 3
At the Newark Museum there is an exhibition called Angels and Tomboys
that is currently showing. One of the artworks that are depicted is called Height of Fashion, created by Lily Martin
Spencer in the year 1854, and is a lithograph. During this time American art
was starting to more noticed and popular. Many American artists became famous
for their depiction of what was going on in America during this time, like with
the expansion of settlers into the west.
The lithograph is a black and white satiric print of an
African-American girl with a pet dog in her lap, fake monocle and a finger
extended pretending to be fashionable. She is wearing a hat, necklace, and her
dress extends off her shoulders. Both the girl and the dog are looking at the
viewer. The artist poked fun at the pretentiousness of the child and the
trappings and mannerisms associated with high society. Lily Martin Spencer was
instrumental in popularizing girlhood imagery in the mid-1850’s, when this
theme became increasingly accepted in American art. Her lithographs were mass
produced and distributed to an expanding middle class hungry for inexpensive
prints with accessible subjects that could be used for home decoration.
The second artwork that will be discussed is called The Lovers, which was created by Rene
Magritte. It was made in 1928 and is an oil on canvas painting. Magritte was
one of the Surrealist painters, he had formulated within his own more
commonplace system of visual images another strategy for evoking the new
Surrealist reality, in which the normal associations of objects, images, and their
names dissolved in a scheme of identities whose rules were still to be fathomed
and reconstructed.
In The Lovers, there are two
people, a woman and a man, kissing each other, but they have their heads
covered by a piece of cloth. The cloth completely obscures them from each
other. They are wearing formal clothing, and they are centrally located and
take up most of the composition. Magritte’s
conviction sometimes led toward the erotic, even the gruesome of sadistic in
the subject matter of his work. “In my pictures I showed objects situated where
we never find them. They represented the realization of the real, if unconscious,
desire existing in most people (Magritte)” (Hunter 185).
Both of these works are a comment on what people consider important, or
what they do. The first work by Spencer is a comment on society’s view of what
they consider important- fashion. The second work by Magritte is a comment on
the eroticism of humans, and how they overlook of do not see certain things that
are right in front of them. In Height of
Fashion, Spencer comments on the role of women, how fashion is considered
such an important part of their gender, and the absurdity of the importance
that is placed on it. In Magritte’s work The
Lovers, he depicts gender by the interaction between males and females and
the sexual desires that everyone feels. Surrealism was one of the art movements
around the beginning of the 20th century that would lead to
Modernism, which became an art movement out of Switzerland and made its way to
America. Part of it was about creating art with the least amount of things,
keeping the design clean, and it still being art.
Newark Museum Website
Sources:
Modern Art by Sam Hunter, John
Jacobus, and Daniel Wheeler
The Information plague next to the artwork in the Newark MuseumGoogle Images
In your own perspective, can you give me more information upon "The Lover"? I just thought it would be fresh to have your outlook. :)
ReplyDeleteSince they are dressed in formal clothing I think that it is saying that everyone, even the rich, who are usually very concerned on how they appear to others, cannot suppress thier natural feelings and carnal desires. These two are giving into their lust for another person, even if they do not know that person. I think this is about giving into the unconscious desires of our hidden selves.
DeleteOne of the ideas behind "The Lovers" is that regardless of what people are thinking consciously, there is a deep primal instinct in humans to act upon their desires, that they may not even be aware of. Given what you know about Magritte, do you think this work defends the idea that we must act upon these instincts, or that knowing that these instincts are always there, we should find conscious, deliberate ways of dealing with them?
ReplyDeleteWhat I think that Magritte was trying to say with this work is not whether we have to give into these desires, but that they are there and that most people do give into them, whether they realize it or not. He created this work so that people who see it would realize that those feelings are there, what they do with those feelings is more on the individual then people as a whole. Some people are the type who do whatever they feel like, and other people will fight against their automatic feelings for whatever reason they have, it could be religion, morals, or something else.
Delete